What's the latest on this object?

I've seen them in most imagery that NASA had digitized. I also believe they are image artifacts.

@Bern nothing wrong w what you stated at all.

@LeftyLuck let off the gas some, Lefty. Please.

Neal Did you do this rendering? Jimmy

This is really good stuff. Nice work.

Joe, From what I'm seeing so far I'm gng to say we may have at least two basic sizes of Martian people. One would be comparable to humans Another would be around 2 feet in height.

Thanks, Neal. Good link!!!! I've never see this. Of course, I"m living in the world of the Analysts NOtebook and it takes time for the work to be completed there. They're no where near this SOL yet.

Obfuscation is applied to heavily here, Neal, that it looks like a straight up oil painting. This happens often.

I see what you're seeing. Could be that, or something completely artificial. Does not look like a rock formation to me. I've found some other insect and roach-like posibilities I'll add to this. I'll find them when I return home. in a week

Absolutely, the obfuscation software is turned off for this image. Or that expelled lander/rover section would've been 'rockified' to the max I promise you.

I see that. Very interesting. We need to take these and run an intense brightness/contrast or exposure filter on them. The moon is not what we are told.

Yeah, the problem is this: Even if the shapes we see are at times those of actual 'beings' I'm not sure they'd be alive. I usually check for movement by looking at imagery from different angles and times. If possible. The very best image of a potential human is from {i'll have to find the PIA#} and that's the thing, the individual shots and other angles aren't available for comparison. But it's the potential 'man in the vest, leaning against something' that intrigues me. I think there's the possibility also, and DAve Gannet talked about this in our last live show, that there are mud fossils evident.

Which video is this from?

Yes, post in the Rover/Satellite imagery catagory if that is what fits. Looking forward to seeing/discussing

Dave, I'm going to go ahead and open up the forum. Slowly.

...and regarding what?

I do see the embedding issue. Link is correct but I agree not what we want. Let's look further into the issue.

Okay y'all that link works well.

Blah